THE CIVILIAN WAR-RELATED CHRONIC STRESS SCALE (CWCS-S): FROM PCL-C ADAPTATION TO A NEW DIAGNOSTIC TOOL

Authors

  • T. Ivanova Sumy State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.1.4

Keywords:

chronic stress, civilian population, method adaptation, traumatic reactivity, emotional isolation, cognitive avoidance, validity

Abstract

The article presents the process of adapting the PTSD Checklist – Civilian Version (PCL-C) and its transformation into a new diagnostic tool – the Civilian War-related Chronic Stress Scale (CWCS-S). A three-factor structure of the method was identified, reflecting the main aspects of civilians’ psychological response to prolonged war threat: traumatic reactivity (intrusive memories, hypervigilance, increased reactivity to triggers), emotional isolation (detachment from others, emotional numbing, loss of interest in usual activities), and cognitive avoidance (avoidance of thoughts, conversations, and situations related to war). The study was conducted in several stages: (1) initial adaptation of PCL-C considering the specifics of civilians’ war experience (focus groups, expert evaluations); (2) pilot study with 58 respondents; (3) main study with 788 participants (365 residents of frontline territories, 212 internally displaced persons, 211 residents of relatively safe regions). Factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure of the method (total explained variance 67.3%). Internal consistency of factors (Cronbach’s α) was 0.89, 0.85, and 0.83 respectively. Convergent validity was confirmed by correlations with the Mississippi Scale (r = 0.69), Impact of Event Scale (r = 0.65), and HADS (r = 0.62-0.64). Test-retest reliability (n = 124, 3-week interval) for the total score was r = 0.82, for factors r = 0.79-0.84. CWCS-S demonstrates good psychometric properties and can be used to assess the psychological state of civilians under conditions of prolonged war. Unlike classical PTSD assessment tools, the scale takes into account the specifics of chronic stress state arising from constant war threat and allows differentiation of various aspects of psychological adaptation to prolonged military conflict.

References

Wang X., Lee J., Brown K., Patel S. Psychological resilience in war zones: A meta-analysis of civilian trauma responses. Journal of Trauma Studies. 2024. Vol. 32, №1. P. 45-62.

Zhdanova I., Petrenko O., Kozak L. Long-term psychological effects of war: A case study of internally displaced persons in Ukraine. European Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2023. Vol. 29, №3. P. 78-91.

Brown L., Green K. Chronic war exposure and PTSD: A comparative study between veterans and civilians. International Journal of Trauma Studies. 2019. Vol. 8, №2. P. 145-160.

Taylor R., Williams M. Continuous combat operations and the onset of PTSD symptoms: Evaluating the long-term effects. Military Medicine Review. 2021. Vol. 10, №1. P. 50-65.

Steel Z., Silove D., Phan T., Bauman A. Long-term effects of trauma exposure in war-affected populations. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2009. Vol. 44, №5. P. 389-395.

Neria Y., Bromet E.J., Sievers H. Post-traumatic stress disorder in civilian populations affected by war: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2008. Vol. 28, №4. P. 486-503.

Carpiniello B. PTSD in prolonged conflict: The challenges of assessment and intervention. Psychiatry and War Studies. 2023. Vol. 14, №4. P. 200-219.

Weathers F.W., Litz B.T., Herman D.S., Huska J.A., Keane T.M. The PTSD Checklist – Civilian Version (PCL-C): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1994. Vol. 7, №3. P. 393-405.

National Center for PTSD. PTSD Checklist – Civilian Version (PCL-C). U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. 2023. URL: https://www.ptsd.va.gov.

Герасименко Л.О., Скрипніков А.М., Ісаков Р.І. Реакція на важкий стрес та розлади адаптації. Посттравматичний стресовий розлад. Київ: ВСВ «Медицина», 2023. 120 с.

Krupelnytska L., Yatsenko N., Keller V., Morozova-Larina O. The Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R): Validation of the Ukrainian Version. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2024. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4732826.

Чабан О.С., Хаустова О.О., Безшейко В.Г. Практична психосоматика. Діагностичні шкали. Київ: Медкнига, 2019. 112 с.

Моргун В.Ф., Тітов І.Г. Основи психологічної діагностики. 3-є вид. Київ: Слово, 2019. 464 с.

Діхтяренко С.Ю. Психологічна гнучкість особистості як предмет наукового вивчення. Теорія і практика сучасної психології. 2020. №1(2). С. 76-81.

Hobfoll S.E., Hall B.J., Canetti D. Political violence, psychological distress, and resilience: The impact on civilians. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2012. Vol. 50, №1-2. P. 1-12.

Van der Kolk B., McFarlane A.C., Weisaeth L. Traumatic Stress: The Effects of Overwhelming Experience on Mind, Body, and Society. New York: The Guilford Press, 2014. 596 р.

Vargová L., Jozefiaková B., Lačný M. et al. War-related stress scale. BMC Psychology. 2024. Vol. 12. P. 208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01687-9.

Diamond G. M., Lipsitz J. D., Hoffman Y. Nonpathological response to ongoing traumatic stress. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 2013. Vol. 19, №2. P. 100-111.

Published

2025-03-25

How to Cite

Іванова, Т. (2025). THE CIVILIAN WAR-RELATED CHRONIC STRESS SCALE (CWCS-S): FROM PCL-C ADAPTATION TO A NEW DIAGNOSTIC TOOL. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, (1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.1.4